WHY EXCLUDING EXEMPT CHILDREN IS ILLEGAL
And Why, Nevertheless, These Policies Persist
[Permission granted to share this article freely with attribution.]
Every state in the U.S. has laws to exclude exempt children from daycare and school during a local outbreak. The theory is that unvaccinated children lack immunity and thus pose a risk to themselves and others.
First, as health policy is generally based on accepted mainstream science, we must start with the science. While health science is substantially corrupt (experts say that ½ or more of the medical literature is unreliable[i]), accepted science works fine here. Vaccines don’t work in everyone[ii] and vaccine immunity wears off in some children. As much as 10 – 15% or more of vaccinated children lack vaccine immunity. In contrast, CDC data claims a 2.2% exemption rate for the nation overall in the 2020-21 school year (for children in daycare and school),[iii] and some of them have natural immunity, which they can get without developing symptoms from inapparent infections (subclinical and asymptomatic infections).[iv] So, there are considerably more non-immune vaccinated children than non-immune exempt children; and you can’t tell a child’s immune status by his or her vaccination status, a titer test is required.
Clearly, then, the focus on exempt children is misplaced as to any real health concern. But it is very well-placed for purposes of covert profit and control agendas masquerading as health concerns. The unscientific exclusion of exempt children is deliberate, of course. They who set the nation’s healthcare policies have impressive credentials and professional experience; it is simply not tenable that unscientific policies are accidental. There may be many underlying motives, but money is clearly one of them. The VICP’s $5B payout[v] and DHHS’ claim that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events get reported[vi] powerfully support estimates that 10’s of thousands of new vaccine chronic illnesses and deaths occur in the U.S. each year, if not well over 100,000 (pre-covid figures). Each new chronically ill child is a potential lifelong customer for other pharmaceutical products. This has brought pharma trillions of dollars in new sales over recent decades, when official government statistics show that vaccines followed—didn’t cause—the substantial decline in childhood infectious disease deaths across the mid 1900’s.[vii] To compare, the cost of ending poverty throughout the entire African continent has been estimated to be $4B to $6B, a tiny fraction of pharma profits. (Clearly, the world’s top financial elites, some of whom have a personal net worth exceeding $100 B, have no interest in saving humanity, as many could do so singlehandedly.)
So, only exempt children are excluded during a local outbreak despite the science telling us that vaccinated groups pose the greater health risk (if either group poses a significant health risk at all). To see why such unscientific policies have been established, we need only look to their effect. For example, excluding children puts pressure on exempting parents to conform—to vaccinate over their well-informed objections and legal right to refuse, to the financial benefit of pharma and the advancement of corrupt government control agendas, as excluded exempt children can return to school immediately upon being vaccinated. Legally, this discrimination arguably violates due process rights (it is fundamentally unfair), equal protection rights (it treats similarly situated parents and children differently), “free exercise” rights with respect to religious exemptions, and education rights. A policy based on real science would either ignore the incidental concern raised by exempt children (who clearly pose no concern since the far greater number of non-immune vaccinated kids remain in school); or every vaccinated child would have to be titer tested and any found to be lacking immunity would have to also be excluded. (Actually, a policy based on real science wouldn’t mandate vaccines in the first place.) Don’t hold your breath waiting for either of these to happen, though, because these policies aren’t about science; they are about profit and control. Because of this, proper policies will never be implemented until the powerful corruption driving these policies is dismantled or disarmed. Corrupt power—not science and law—drives vaccine policy. Want to change policy? Unseat the corrupt power. Until then, arguing the science and law won’t fix anything. Power beats truth.
As for the real science, these policies get even stupider. Excluded children can immediately return to school if they get vaccinated. Really?! Vaccines take days or weeks to elicit a full antibody response, and they don’t elicit that response in every recipient. But again, this isn’t about science, it’s about money and power, control. Pay homage to our pharma overlords, and they may bestow their grace upon you. Get your vaccine, and you can come back to school.
Immunization policies are not about health. They never were. They are about advancing criminal money and control agendas under a false pretense of health. Our society would never accept the real agendas if they were fully transparent. So, they must be disguised. There has to be an overlay, a veneer, a false cover. False health narratives do this beautifully. They are anchored to a subconscious fear of death from the diseases that drives conscious level perception. The driving fear, being subconscious, is invisible. Thus, it operates automatically, covertly controlling conscious perception. It’s so powerful that even most medical doctors fall victim to it. They aren’t careless or stupid; the psychology is simply more powerful than their intellects. And you can’t fix that with information or analysis on the conscious level, because the barrier is subconscious fear. Arguing facts against subconscious fear is treating the symptom instead of the cause. Subconscious fear controls the operation of the conscious intellect, not the other way around. So, a psychological process is required to get free from the manipulation. This is why decades of ever-greater activism work, addressing only conscious level concerns, has always been met by an accelerating agenda. We’ve missed the more fundamental aspect of the problem. (See Fear vs. Knowledge for a more complete introduction to the psychology that controls both sleeper and aware communities.)
OK, current vaccine policies are scientifically flawed—absurd when you factor in the mass casualties from vaccines and the proven safe alternatives such as homeoprophylaxis, which has been successfully applied to millions in third-world countries—the evidence doesn’t get any stronger than that. So, how have these exclusion policies managed to persist for decades?
The answer is multi-faceted, but first, those driving these policies are not incompetent or stupid; their actions are calculated and deliberate. They are methodically rolling out a control agenda one step at a time. Most of the people on the front lines implementing and enforcing these policies, however, are unwitting pawns in the game. They truly believe they’re doing the right thing. They are unwitting victims of brilliant psychological manipulation that controls, powerfully, what looks logical to them. It causes their conscious minds to see (perceive) vaccines as logical, self-evident, so “obviously” good and necessary that no critical review is needed. That being the case, the truth—the real science—appears illogical and dangerous. So, truth is instantly (reflexively) rejected. Pyschological manipulation literally causes its victims to unwittingly push away truth. Those driving this from the top know exactly what’s going on, while the manipulation causes most school administrators, local health officials, and parents to truly believe and support the false narratives, unwittingly of course. When we criticize them, we reveal our own cognitive dissonance, because their views are not due to stupidity or carelessness, they are due to powerful psychological manipulation. Just as their perceptions are not by accident, our cognitive dissonance isn’t, either. We, too, are manipulated without our knowing it.
So, why hasn’t there been a flood of lawsuits challenging these corrupt exclusion policies? Assuming one has the money and emotional stamina to prosecute a lawsuit in the first place, such a challenge would face enormous hurdles including:
1) Judges are just as manipulated as everyone else. The manipulation causes them to misperceive or ignore the law to “save” the community.
2) Courts don’t decide the science, they weigh the evidence. Since most state and federal health agencies and medical experts are pro-vaccine (due to the psychological manipulation), the overwhelming weight of the evidence supports current (ultimately corrupt) vaccine policies.
3) The first judge to challenge decades of status quo would surely be viciously attacked by controllers seeking to quickly suppress the truth and make an example out of the judge to keep other ethical judges quiet; and by the manipulated masses venting their outrage as their (implanted) infectious disease fears are triggered. Such a judge would be risking his or her career, if not his or her life or the wellbeing of his or her loved ones.[viii]
4) The legal systems are corrupt or corruptible-on-demand by powerful controllers. Judges can be (and are routinely) bribed, coerced, or removed. You can’t use a corrupt system to fix itself or any other corrupt system. Power, not truth, controls the outcome of any lawsuit the elite deem to be of critical importance to their agenda. This doesn’t mean there’s no solution, though; it just means that a real solution must operate outside of the corrupt, controlled systems our activism work currently operates in. But such solution need only supplement, not replace, our current activism work, as it’s about freeing up our current activism work.
The above discussion doesn’t factor in other legitimate concerns such as whether the germ theory is even valid in the first place, for example. But we needn’t go that far to see serious holes in current policies. The question then becomes what to do about it. Fixing this requires more than just arguing facts, as decades of ever-greater activism work has shown us. It will require addressing the corruption in the systems we turn to in our activism work. That requires addressing the subconscious fear barriers implanted in both sleeper and aware communities that control conscious level perception to hide the problem and solution in each community, respectively. Look for upcoming information about how to do that.
Alan Phillips, J.D.
Vaccine Rights Legal Expert
Have an exemption question? Contact Alan at email@example.com. Some questions may be addressed in future articles.
Like what you see? Consider a one-time or small monthly donation to help keep these articles coming!
Other exemption articles may be found at https://vaccinerights.substack.com/archive
[i] E.g.: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,” Marsha Angell, M.D., Harvard University, author of The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine; “…much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue,” Richard Horton, BSc MB FRCPF MedSci, Editor in Chief, The Lancet
[ii] For example, vaccine effectiveness is: 1) 80% and lower for pertussis vaccines, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088088/; 2) 85% to 98% for chicken pox after the 1st and 2nd doses respectively, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/varicella/hcp-effective-duration.htm; 3) 93% and 97% for measles 1st and 2nd doses respectively, https://www.cdc.gov/measles/vaccination.html; 4) 5% - 15% of Hep B vaccine recipients are “non-responders,” http://www.hepb.org/blog/hbv-vaccine-nonresponder-alternatives/.
[iv] CDC, Vaccines and Immunizations, Glossary, “Inapparent infection: The presence of infection without symptoms. Also known as subclinical or asymptomatic infection.” https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/glossary.html#i.
[vi] U.S. DHHS, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, "Electronic Support for Public Health--Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)," Results p. 6. (2011)
[vii] See, e.g., Dissolving Illusions, Suzanne Humphries, M.D., Roman Bystrianyk, https://www.dissolvingillusions.com/. Click on “Graphs” for quick insight from official government data. One graph showing multiple disease declines: http://www.dissolvingillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/G11.2-UK-Deaths-1838-1978.png
[viii] See, e.g., “Holistic Doctor Death Series: Over 90 Dead,” Health Nut News, March 12, 2016.